The Catholic case against attacking Syria


By Dan Ebener


Based on Catholic social teaching, here are seven reasons to oppose a U.S. military strike against Syria:
1. Just cause. The use of chemical weapons crosses a threshold that was established as illegal since the end of World War I. It is assumed but not proven that the chemical attack was the work of the Assad government (Syria). However, it is conceivable (even if unlikely) that the rebel groups staged the chemical attack to provoke a U.S. response. Just cause requires a burden of proof.
2. Legitimate authority. Russia and China would veto any U.S. attempt to get U.N. support for a military strike against Syria. Because the U.S. was not directly attached, a U.S. attack on Syria would violate international law — unless we obtain U.N. backing. We would be breaking international law against a country that we think broke international law to show that breaking international law is wrong.
3. Probability of success. Nation-building is an elusive goal. If we remove Assad from power, what is the strategic objective? Who will take his place? The rebel groups we support are now controlled by extremists such as Al Qaida. If we weaken Assad and the rebels win out, we could be placing terrorist groups in control of Syria and giving them access to Assad’s weapons.
4. Proportionality. Any direct action by the U.S. could escalate the war and increase the involvement of Russia, China and Iran. If the U.S. retaliates against the Syrian government, Assad could retaliate as well. The damage that would be done with a military strike is unlikely to be proportionate to any good that might be accomplished.
5. Discrimination.  How would a U.S. strike against military installations discriminate between combatants and the civilian population? Modern warfare has demonstrated how difficult it is to attack by ground or by air without killing innocent bystanders.
6. Last resort. We are quick to resort to military solutions because we lack the strength, wisdom and know-how to resolve international conflicts in peaceful ways. The problem is not that peacemaking has been tried and failed. Nonviolent means have not been tried.
7. Option for the poor. An attack on Syria could worsen the situation for millions of Syrian refugees. Funding that would be used for a military attack could be re-directed toward humanitarian assistance. Our credibility, character and reputation would be enhanced if we focused more on the works of mercy and less on the works of war.
 (Dan Ebener is director of stewardship and parish planning for the Davenport Diocese.)

Support The Catholic Messenger’s mission to inform, educate and inspire the faithful of the Diocese of Davenport – and beyond! Subscribe to the print and/or e-edition, or make a one-time donation, today!

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Posted on

2 thoughts on “The Catholic case against attacking Syria

  1. Thanks Dan Ebner, war is something very serious, it should not be decided lightly. Of the seven reasons I strongly support the 3rd; we should be able to learn from our past mistakes. Removing Assad from power and enhace terrorist groups will not improve but worsen the situation in the middle East.

  2. Mr. Ebner, you make some very interesting points. In your third point, you speak about the power surge and what could hypothetically take place if Assad eventually is overthrown or removed. You raise the question, “Who will take his place.” The western world fears that an extreme (islamic) political group that opposes the US could take Assad’s throne. But we must realize that even if this were to take place, should we still watch Assad massacre his own people because of hypothetical situations? I personally don’t see how the international community would allow a terrorist group to have access to chemical weapons. If Assad were to be overthrown, the weapons would most likely be in the hand of the Russians, and most likely, the United Nations. Also, It is not in the United States interest to rebuild Syria. For they are taking a newly conservative approach to Middle Eastern conflicts due to what unfolded in Iraq. As a nation whose platform is liberty and justice, our job is to concern ourselves with humanitarian rights, not with what could hypothetically occur if Assad were to be overthrown. Overall, You made some insightful statements

Comments are closed.